Stay Connected, Stay Updated!

Subscribe to the PURPOSE newsletter and receive regular updates, inspiration and stories about and around steward-ownership.

Sign up for our newsletter

Write us an email

STEWARD-OWNERSHIP

Steward-ownership is a corporate ownership structure that presents an alternative to shareholder value primacy. It ensures that companies prioritize their long-term purpose over short-term profits – by legally enshrining two principles:

SELF-DETERMINATION

Power over the company cannot be speculated with but is held by people directly connected to the company’s operation and mission: stewards, not absentee owners.

PURPOSE-ORIENTATION

Profits are means to a purpose, not a goal in itself. Value created in the company cannot be extracted by the shareholders. Profits are reinvested, used to cover capital costs or donated.

PROVEN AND INNOVATIVE MODEL

Steward-ownership brings together start-ups, medium-sized businesses and large corporations. It combines modern with traditional entrepreneurship, sustainability with profitable business.

It is a proven ownership model that has been in place for many decades – having been implemented by companies like Zeiss (Germany), Novo Nordisk (Denmark), Patagonia (USA), Bosch (Germany), Signal (USA) BuurtzorgT (Netherlands), Carlsberg (Denmark) and many others. At the same time, it presents an innovative alternative to conventional ownership models. It allows start-ups to legally safeguard their purpose-oriented businesses and enables medium-sized business and Hidden Champions to set-up sustainable charters, where successors can become steward-owners independent of family affiliation or acquisition power. It also allows large corporations and market leaders to set up aligned and sustainable structures for the future.

Steward-ownership has the potential to contribute to creating an economy fit for the 21st century.

Instead of trying to change corporate behaviour on the surface, it
focuses on the very core and DNA of a company – namely its ownership. By addressing fundamental structural deficiencies of our system, it retools the goals and incentives that guide decision making. Steward-ownership (re)prioritizes the purpose of the company instead of maximizing short-term profits; and it safeguards the company’s independence in the long-run.

Implementing Steward-Ownership 

Today, the path to steward-ownership is still hilly. Many pioneers have found their way of implementing purpose-orientation and self-determination. For instance, they use trusts and foundations to do so. But for startups and many medium-sized companies alike, this is not an option due to high costs and the complexity of such constructs.

With our work at PURPOSE, we lower the hills and make steward-ownership more accessible for everyone. As a group of organizations, we provide non-profit knowledge & resources, consulting and investments necessary to make steward-ownership accessible for everyone and realize its potential for an economy fit for the 21st century.

  • NON-PROFIT

    We research and promote steward-ownership to help spread awareness of alternatives to the shareholder primacy paradigm, we also develop open source ressources to make steward-ownership more accessible
  • SUPPORT

    For start-ups and mature businesses alike, we provide hands-on support to develop legal, financing and governance solutions the company’s history, industry, and future.
  • Investment

    With our investment vehicles we aim to activate capital for young and mature steward-owned companies. Our financing enables them to grow and transition to SO with patient, purpose-aligned investments

Forms of Implementation

Double Foundation Model
A standard model that legally separates money and power: One entity holds the control rights, with its managers functioning as stewards for the company. Another, charitable, organization holds the economic rights and the capital shares of the company. Examples: Bosch (Germany), Patagonia (US), Globus (Germany).

Single Foundation Model
Another classic model: All voting and economic rights of a company are held by a self-governing non-profit foundation. It acts as a shareholder and guardian of the steward-ownership structure and principles. Examples: Novo Nordisk (Denmark), Zeiss (Germany), Carlsberg (Denmark), Märkisches Landbrot (Germany), Elobau (Germany).

Veto Share Model
In this model, the guiding principles of steward-ownership are being included into the company’s articles of association. The steward-owners of the company hold 99% of the control rights, but no economic rights. 1% of the control rights, the so-called “veto-share” or “golden-share”, is held by an independent non-profit entity. It has the right to veto any article changes or actions affecting the principles of steward-ownership. Economic rights remain within the company or can be given to investors or founders – but only to a limited extent. Examples: Ecosia (Germany), Sharetribe (Finland), Wildplastic (Germany).

Perpetual Purpose Trust
In the US, a Perpetual Purpose Trust (PPT) is a common model for installing steward-ownership. A PPT is set up for the benefit of a purpose rather than a person and can operate indefinitely. It holds the shares of the company. The trustees (i.e. steward-owners) control the PPT, but cannot extract the value or profits of the company. Examples: Organically Grown Company (US), Firebrand Artisan Breads (US).

Employee Ownership Trust
In this model that is especially common in the UK, the shares of the company are held by an employee ownership trust. Thereby the company is indirectly controlled by its employees. If the employees only have limited access to the dividends at the same time, the setup corresponds with the principles of steward-ownership. Examples: John Lewis Partnership (UK).